When you look at the Fig
Salt sensitive: Participants with SBP being at least 5 mmHg higher after HS intake compared to the values after the LS intake; Salt resistant: Participants whose SBP differed by <5 mmHg between HS and LS intakes; Independent variables: Urinary Na + , Urinary K + and Na + :K + excretion ratio; Dependent variable: SBP; Categorical variable: Participants were categorized into groups on the basis of increments of 1 g/day in urinary Na + and K + excretion to evaluate the linear trends
Mathematical study
General linear models had been used in linear regression research (Pearson’s Roentgen correlation) to assess the association out-of urinary Na + and you will K + removal having SBP. To own Figs. dos and you can 3, two-way ANOVA that have Tukey’s post hoc try did examine SBP one of the organizations laid out on such basis as urinary Na + and K + removal. To measure the effectiveness of expanding urinary Na + and you can K + removal relative to SBP, Cohn’s Feeling Proportions is computed. During the Figs. cuatro and you can 5 general Pearson’s R relationship is actually profile fling performed to evaluate the newest organization of urinary Na + :K + excretion ratio which have SBP. 6 study was reviewed by a about three-way ANOVA in addition to pairwise reviews have been made having fun with Tukey’s blog post hoc shot. eight relative frequency delivery is actually reviewed using a great Gaussian complement research. 05 (GraphPad prism software, variation 8). Investigation is demonstrated once the imply ± SD.
Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes sodium excretion of <5 g/day, in salt sensitive (n = 154) and salt resistant (n = 180) group, slope of the for salt sensitive group is indicated for the sodium excretion ranges of <2–2.99 g/day, 3–3.99 g/day and 4–4.99 g/day (b) Correlation of baseline SBP (dependent variable) across the entire range of urinary sodium excretion (independent variable), (Pearson’s R 2 for salt sensitive = 0.02 and for salt resistant = 0.02), in salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) individuals.
Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes potassium excretion for salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) group, slope for salt sensitive and salt resistant group is indicated for the potassium excretion range <1–1.99 g/day, values shown as mean ± SD. b Correlation of baseline SBP (dependent variable) across the entire range urinary potassium excretion (independent variable), (Pearson’s R 2 for salt sensitive = 0.001 and salt resistant = 0.008), in salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) individuals.
Standard SBP in line with urinary sodium so you’re able to potassium excretion proportion (Na + /K + ) (a) correlation from baseline SBP (dependent changeable) across the whole selection of urinary Na + /K + excretion (independent adjustable), (Pearson’s R dos to have sodium painful and sensitive = 0.0004 and you may salt resistant = 0.0016) (b) baseline SBP according to alterations in salt excretion and you can potassium excretion assortment in the salt sensitive and painful (n = 186) and sodium unwilling (letter = 222) some body on tests on the typical eating plan, values revealed since the mean ± SD. Data were assessed of the three-way ANOVA which have pairwise comparison with Tukey’s article hoc shot.
Correlation out of SBP beliefs along side whole list of urinary sodium to help you potassium excretion (Na + /K + ) ratio for the salt delicate (letter = 71) and you can salt resistant (n = 119) people with weight reduction intervention of Weight loss Answers to Stop Blood pressure (DASH) (a) high salt (HS), (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 getting sodium sensitive and painful = 0.04 and you can sodium resistant = 0.04) (b) lower sodium (LS) diet plan, (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 for salt sensitive = 0.02 and you will sodium unwilling = 0.00002).