In all analyses statistical significance was set at p When you look at the Fig Salt sensitive: Participants with SBP being at least 5 mmHg higher after HS intake compared to the values after the LS intake; Salt resistant: Participants whose SBP differed by Mathematical study General linear models had been used in linear regression research (Pearson’s Roentgen correlation) to assess the association out-of urinary Na + and you will K + removal having SBP. To own Figs. dos and you can 3, two-way ANOVA that have Tukey’s post hoc try did examine SBP one of the organizations laid out on such basis as urinary Na + and K + removal. To measure the effectiveness of expanding urinary Na + and you can K + removal relative to SBP, Cohn’s Feeling Proportions is computed. During the Figs. cuatro and you can 5 general Pearson’s R relationship is actually performed to evaluate the newest organization of urinary Na + :K + excretion ratio which have SBP. 6 study was reviewed by a about three-way ANOVA in addition to pairwise reviews have been made having fun with Tukey’s blog post hoc shot. eight relative frequency delivery is actually reviewed using a great Gaussian complement research. 05 (GraphPad prism software, variation 8). Investigation is demonstrated once the imply ± SD. Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes sodium excretion of Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes potassium excretion for salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) group, slope for salt sensitive and salt resistant group is indicated for the potassium excretion range Standard SBP in line with urinary sodium so you’re able to potassium excretion proportion (Na + /K + ) (a) correlation from baseline SBP (dependent changeable) across the whole selection of urinary Na + /K + excretion (independent adjustable), (Pearson’s R dos to have sodium painful and sensitive = 0.0004 and you may salt resistant = 0.0016) (b) baseline SBP according to alterations in salt excretion and you can potassium excretion assortment in the salt sensitive and painful (n = 186) and sodium unwilling (letter = 222) some body on tests on the typical eating plan, values revealed since the mean ± SD. Data were assessed of the three-way ANOVA which have pairwise comparison with Tukey’s article hoc shot. Correlation out of SBP beliefs along side whole list of urinary sodium to help you potassium excretion (Na + /K + ) ratio for the salt delicate (letter = 71) and you can salt resistant (n = 119) people with weight reduction intervention of Weight loss Answers to Stop Blood pressure (DASH) (a) high salt (HS), (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 getting sodium sensitive and painful = 0.04 and you can sodium resistant = 0.04) (b) lower sodium (LS) diet plan, (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 for salt sensitive = 0.02 and you will sodium unwilling = 0.00002).

In all analyses statistical significance was set at p < 0

When you look at the Fig

Salt sensitive: Participants with SBP being at least 5 mmHg higher after HS intake compared to the values after the LS intake; Salt resistant: Participants whose SBP differed by <5 mmHg between HS and LS intakes; Independent variables: Urinary Na + , Urinary K + and Na + :K + excretion ratio; Dependent variable: SBP; Categorical variable: Participants were categorized into groups on the basis of increments of 1 g/day in urinary Na + and K + excretion to evaluate the linear trends

Mathematical study

General linear models had been used in linear regression research (Pearson’s Roentgen correlation) to assess the association out-of urinary Na + and you will K + removal having SBP. To own Figs. dos and you can 3, two-way ANOVA that have Tukey’s post hoc try did examine SBP one of the organizations laid out on such basis as urinary Na + and K + removal. To measure the effectiveness of expanding urinary Na + and you can K + removal relative to SBP, Cohn’s Feeling Proportions is computed. During the Figs. cuatro and you can 5 general Pearson’s R relationship is actually profile fling performed to evaluate the newest organization of urinary Na + :K + excretion ratio which have SBP. 6 study was reviewed by a about three-way ANOVA in addition to pairwise reviews have been made having fun with Tukey’s blog post hoc shot. eight relative frequency delivery is actually reviewed using a great Gaussian complement research. 05 (GraphPad prism software, variation 8). Investigation is demonstrated once the imply ± SD.

Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes sodium excretion of <5 g/day, in salt sensitive (n = 154) and salt resistant (n = 180) group, slope of the for salt sensitive group is indicated for the sodium excretion ranges of <2–2.99 g/day, 3–3.99 g/day and 4–4.99 g/day (b) Correlation of baseline SBP (dependent variable) across the entire range of urinary sodium excretion (independent variable), (Pearson’s R 2 for salt sensitive = 0.02 and for salt resistant = 0.02), in salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) individuals.

Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes potassium excretion for salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) group, slope for salt sensitive and salt resistant group is indicated for the potassium excretion range <1–1.99 g/day, values shown as mean ± SD. b Correlation of baseline SBP (dependent variable) across the entire range urinary potassium excretion (independent variable), (Pearson’s R 2 for salt sensitive = 0.001 and salt resistant = 0.008), in salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) individuals.

Standard SBP in line with urinary sodium so you’re able to potassium excretion proportion (Na + /K + ) (a) correlation from baseline SBP (dependent changeable) across the whole selection of urinary Na + /K + excretion (independent adjustable), (Pearson’s R dos to have sodium painful and sensitive = 0.0004 and you may salt resistant = 0.0016) (b) baseline SBP according to alterations in salt excretion and you can potassium excretion assortment in the salt sensitive and painful (n = 186) and sodium unwilling (letter = 222) some body on tests on the typical eating plan, values revealed since the mean ± SD. Data were assessed of the three-way ANOVA which have pairwise comparison with Tukey’s article hoc shot.

Correlation out of SBP beliefs along side whole list of urinary sodium to help you potassium excretion (Na + /K + ) ratio for the salt delicate (letter = 71) and you can salt resistant (n = 119) people with weight reduction intervention of Weight loss Answers to Stop Blood pressure (DASH) (a) high salt (HS), (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 getting sodium sensitive and painful = 0.04 and you can sodium resistant = 0.04) (b) lower sodium (LS) diet plan, (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 for salt sensitive = 0.02 and you will sodium unwilling = 0.00002).

Legg igjen en kommentar

Din e-postadresse vil ikke bli publisert.